Better philanthropy

There are not a lot of people who spend their time wondering what a better philanthropic system/market/ecosystem could look like. I am one of those few. Colleagues of mine from Blueprint recently reminded me that I have already outlined a vision of better (in my 2004 book, Creating Philanthropic Capital Markets: The Deliberate Evolution). The elements I identified then were:
·        Aggregated philanthropic dollars
·        Diversity of people, resources, ideas and vehicles
·        Different power dynamics between grantor/grantee
·        Long-term, committed grantmaking for change
·        Integrated resources across sectors
·        Timed well relative to stage of problem and other funding.

I still agree with those, and realized that since 2004 I'd developed some other lists as well. ... These seven building blocks of open philanthropy are:

  • 1.    Facilitate adaptation, don’t hinder it
  • 2.    Design for interoperability, local specificity will follow
  • 3.    Build for the poorest
  • 4.    Assume upward adaptability
  • 5.    Creativity and control will happen locally
  • 6.    Diversity is essential
  • 7.    Complex problems require hybrid solutions

And some 2007 thoughts on aligned investing included these items:

  • Data, research, analysis, strategy, and measurement tools help people put their resources where their personal interests and passions are.
  • the ... philanthropic industry ...is personal, fragmented, and anonymous. It is also strategic, brand-oriented, and – in the aggregate – enormous. Its most generous participants – as measured by percent of net worth given – tend to be the poor, not the rich.
  • While the range of issues they can support is almost limitless; the number of tools that philanthropists have at their disposal is rather small. They have really 7 things to bring to the table: money, knowledge, time, expertise, connections, patience, and independence.
  • I do equate strategy, knowledge, and alignment with effectiveness.

I need a cohesive statement of where the philanthropic industry is now, where it is going, and where are its points of influence. I'll start with these lists above - please feel free to add, subtract, argue with or point me to other sources.


Tags: ,